Ugh. 19 pages and counting. My work cell is very similar to this number, so guess what? I've been getting a LOT of return calls from people about this. If they dial the number, it's obviously disconnected. However, if they hit redial on their phones, it simply calls a local number and bypasses the area code. My prefix is 305, so I've been hammered with calls.
So the number is disconnected; we know that. Someone is spoofing the number and, more specifically, S. Lawrence. Surely something can be done on this. Something I was thinking was a call trace. You'll need to check with your local telco, but I believe on mine it's *72 or something like that. I used this recently when I received obscene phone calls from a couple of kids using "Private Caller."
The calls were sent back to the telco, and then I had to contact the local police department (NOT 911) and open a case. Once I had the case, I had to provide it to the telco, and then the two of them connected to obtain the necessary info. Ultimately the calls were traced (took about a month and a half), and the parents of the kids were notified (per the detective I spoke to). Keep in mind that these initially cost me about $8 or so to do. I was able to get the telco to waive the fees, though.
Why couldn't something like this work? If it points to the 305 area code but is masked, surely the telcos could truly find out where it's from.