951-227-6267

Country: USA
951 area code: California (Corona, Hemet, Riverside)
Read comments below about 9512276267. Report unwanted calls to help identify who is using this phone number.
  • 0
    scarecrow
    | 2 replies
    I got a call from this number and the man said his name is Eric and that he is an attorney and trying to settle with me a debt from a past payday loan. Said that he had some files in his office that are going to be filed in court and that he could avoid me having to go to court by paying a settlement offer.Asked him to send me a letter in the mail with his law firm info and payment request. Got a cheap hand typed out letter on the computer not even proffessional looking..Not beliveing he is an attorney..
    • Call type: Debt collector
  • 0
    nycgirl81 replies to scarecrow
    i had the same situations did you end up finding out if your case was a fraud
  • 0
    kam861
    | 7 replies
    I have just received a hand delivered summons sent from Eric Carmichael, from a place called Recovery Solutions out of Corona Ca.  This is for a debt long passed.  The actual square in the upper right hand corner where the courts would stamp a date with filed on it is not stamped.  The stamp for the clerk looks like it has been mostly whitened out  and the file number is very vague as if it could be fake. Says for the Superior court of the state of California county of Riverside. Don't know.  If anyone else has had this done, maybe you could shed some light on this if you have any info.
    • Caller: Recovery Solutions  Corona CA
    • Call type: Debt collector
  • +5
    Mike-in-MD replies to kam861
    You can contact the Court this alleged summons came from directly to verify the validity.  Does it even have a date to appear?  You should be able to either check online or by phone to see if the document is valid.
  • +4
    Tamianth replies to kam861
    | 1 reply
    Your right, it sounds suspicious..  I'd call the actual court clerk there and inquire, and tell them all this.  They should also be able to tell you if its real or a fakeroo..
  • +1
    ANonieMouse replies to kam861
    First, I need to start with a rather lengthy disclaimer that I can't give you legal advice for California, and you should generally distrust anything called or masquerading as "legal advice" over the Internet, especially free advice from anonymous individuals.  That kind of advice is worth every penny you pay for it -- i.e., nothing.  The only reason for trusting anything that I say is that, when I say anything important, I back it up with third-party sources that you can then check out yourself and judge for yourself whether they are trustworthy.  But applying the law to a particularlized set of facts is the same as practicing law, and I do not want to be accused of practicing law without a license in California.  

    You also do not give enough facts in your post to allow a lawyer to help you effectively.  For example, was your summons served on you in California?  Do you live in California?  Is Riverside County the correct venue for the case?  If you don't file this in your initial answer when it is due, you may waive important defenses or at least make your life much harder by having to defend yourself in a court far away from your home.

    There is also the fact that in California, most of the case details are not available on-line.  It also costs money to search records on line for cases filed by Recovery Solutions (or by any other name).  Searching by the number of the case may be free at the site listed immediately below (but you didn't give your case number).  Searching by number may (or may not) confirm that there is a real case pending against you, but someone else may still have to pay for more detailed records of the case.

    http://public-access.riverside.courts.ca.gov/ ... de=A&RivInd=Riv

    There appear to be mandatory forms like you describe in California for attachment to a summons.  I found one of them here:

    http://www.serveasummons.org/filing-a-summons ... nia-california/

    although it may be different from the form you received because the one I found on the Internet may be for a different court.

    Depending upon how things work in California, the court stamp and date might not appear on a copy of the form until the proof of service is returned to the court.  The stamp for the clerk may be indistinct on your copy, and so might the file number.  However, it is exactly this file number that you or any attorney would need to proceed with any filings in the court.  If you live near the court, you might try to go down in person to get this number and to verify that the summons is real, because anybody can get these forms off the Internet or copy partially filled-in forms and replace information on them.  If you can't get to the court, at least give them a call (or have your attorney call them) to verify that the file number is real and corresponds to a case in which you are involved.

    Whatever you do, be courteous to the clerk, and he will help you as much as he is allowed to.  Remember that the clerk cannot give you legal advice of any type and may be very limited in being able to make referrals to attorneys for you.  He has to remain competely neutral, and may only be able to help you find (and possibly complete) forms for you, and give you limited information about the progress of the case.  He may be able to direct you to a legal aid society or something similar, if you do not have the money to defend yourself.  But the clerk should be able to give you the case number and be able to verify that the summons is or is not real.

    Whatever you do, don't drop the ball.  The summons probably gives you the legal time limit from the date of service to file an answer.  (The clerk can tell probably tell you the actual date by which an answer must be filed.)  If you don't file an answer by that date, you may not only lose important legal defenses, but you may also default on your case.  If the debt is beyond the statute of limitations for California (or whatever other state's laws might apply), you may lose your right to waive the statutory bar defense unless you file the defense in your first answer to the complaint.

    The summons seems to me to have been served in an appropriate, unremarkable manner, although I am not familiar with the specific formalities that the state of California may impose.  Therefore, my guess is that you should assume that this summons is valid unless proven otherwise.

    I wish there were more that I could do to help, but I can't give you, and you should not accept, anonymous legal advice over the Internet.  And in the case of California in particular, it is harder and more expensive to research certain records than it is to do so in other states.  (Searching court records by the name of a party is free in some states).  But that's just the way it is.
  • +2
    Resident47 replies to kam861
    My reactions would be the following:
    - Make scans of the entire suspect document at 600 DPI minimum.
    - Stow the original in a fireproof lockbox.
    - See if summons and complaint forms are available as PDF downloads from the indicated county court. Compare the blanks to the delivered summons in painful detail.
    - Take one of the copies in person to a Riverside court clerk. Ask to see the head clerk as well for another set of eyes. Ask to see blank forms for comparison.
    - Ask them if there is any good reason for a summons to be served upon a person looking like yours does. See if the stamp markings could have plausibly been made by their equipment. Ask if the obscured civil action number matches the format used there. They see hundreds of these documents a year and should pick up anomalies you could miss.
    - Determine if possible if the person performing service actually had the authority to do so.
    - Take written notes right at the counter of everything said. Document clerk names.
    - If you don't live in Riverside, do all this at the Superior court which would otherwise have jurisdiction, namely one in your home area.

    Reasons for all the extra trouble:
    - If suspicions are valid, the clerks' responses will be quite interesting, and they will have difficulty finding a real case folder to match.
    - Debt collectors must sue where defendants live, not any old place they choose as convenient.
    - Parties to litigation are typically not allowed to perform their own process service in person. The server must be someone covered by your court rules, not some flunkie from the plaintiff's office.
    - The FDCPA takes care to prohibit "false representation or implication that documents are legal process." A bogus summons deployed to fool you into paying time-barred debt is a hot property you can "redeem" for an easy damage award, assuming you have a verified target for your *real* lawsuit.

    You could at best have a sloppy and barely legal suit against you. Until that's proven I would assume the worst sort of flim-flam is in play.
  • +2
    Resident47 replies to Tamianth
    Regarding why the place name "Corona" rings a bell, that town has been Ground Zero for the worst and most abusive fake PDL collectors the west coast has to offer, in the style of their cousins (possibly kissing cousins) in South Asia. Funny you'd raise that issue following discussion yesterday in another thread for what may be a "Corona Cabal" member.

    https://800notes.com/Phone.aspx/1-909-456-1888#p625654226592269163
  • +2
    bo replies to kam861
    Agreeing with others, validate the summons with the Clerk of Courts as quickly as possible.   (I'm assuming you are in California.)     If it proves a forgery, it's a matter for the police and the people behind it could be looking as some very serious charges.    Falsifying or even altering court documents are one of those things that send judges off the deep end.
  • 0
    kam861
    | 6 replies
    Update on the Eric guy. From what I can see, it is legit. I have just received from my employer, the payroll division, that this Eric Carmichael has in fact sued me, had a court date in Riverside and is garnishing my wages from an old credit card that was worth only  $300.00 in 2006.  Now he has ordered a garnishing of $1,264.90. It has been sent from the Sacramento County Sheriffs office in which also I have to pay them as well. So it looks as if Eric is not a scam.
  • +1
    mvgordie replies to kam861
    | 3 replies
    In California the statute of limitations for collecting a credit card debt is four years from the breach of such debt: See California Civil Code of Procedure Section 337.

      No action can be brought against anyone whose contract was breached outside the four year statute of limitations, two years for a verbal contract.

      Furthermore, If Mr. Eric Carmichael, represented himself as an attorney, you may be able to take action against him in court, as well filing a complaint with the California Department of Consumer Affairs, The local District Attorney's office, The California State Bar Association and even the California State Attorney Generals Office, as Mr. Eric Carmichael is not registered with the California State Bar, his demand letters show no Bar License etc...

      My daughter had just received a demand letter from Mr. Eric Carmichael from Recovery Solutions at 2621 Green River Road, Corona, CA. 92882 with the phone number of 1-888-624-7774.  Along with his demand letter was a fake document made to like a summons and complaint, however it was on its face flawed, improperly worded and incorrect as to form and required wording per local court rules.

      Also the debt he purchased was in March of 2014, however this debt had a last payment (to the original creditor who charged off the debt) on it in January of 2009, in tolling the time of which an action MUST commence, his demand and threat of action is at least one year past the maximum time allowed under the California Code of Civil Procedure for bringing such action.

      My daughter is luck however, as I, her father have worked for several years in investigations and other areas of legal research and other legal matters, and am poised to give Mr. Carmichael a valuable lesson in law.
  • +1
    CWG40 replies to kam861
    Sounds fake to me.  Check with the country clerk.  Make sure the file number on file with the court matches what you have especially as to the parties to the case.  My suspicion is that he just picked up a random number from the court records and used it to try to intimidate you.  Also check with the state bar to make sure the attorney is licensed in California.

    This is a new one on me.  Someone would only try something like this if they felt they could intimidate someone.  

    Spells fake to me.
  • +1
    CWG40 replies to kam861
    This is still outside the 4 year statute of limitations.  Seems to me this would be heard in small-claims court where you can appear for yourself, the other party does not need to be an attorney. You should show up and contest the debt.  This still looks shady to me.  Only a judge can issue a garnishment order.   If you don't show up the court might grant a judgement via default.  The Sheriff would  be involved after a judgment was issued.    but that would only be after a hearing where you would have the opportunity to contest the claim.  Why would the employer have to know one way or the other whether or not you have been sued?  The employer is not party to the claim, of course if a judgment is rendered he'll have to deduct your wages per the judgment and turn them over to the creditor.  

    Something in your narrative is not making sense.
  • -1
    jason replies to mvgordie
    I personally know Eric Carmichael and he is not an attorney, and he does not represent himself as one. You do not need to be an attorney to sue someone in court. Also, the letter your daughter received was probably a letter of intent, and it probably stated that somewhere. Once you get the filed stamped court documents from a registered process server, then the action is real. It is not illegal or wrong to send a letter of intent and a copy of a proposed complaint. Statute of limitations runs from the date of "last activity". Last activity is very vague. Could mean a payment, promised payment, declined payment, etc;
  • 0
    Ericisanidiot replies to mvgordie
    This guy is an idiot.  FIGHT HIS LAWSUITS, he is only out to get easy defaults.   I sure hope you take him down!!  He is breaking the law, taking advantage of the court system (do some research, he files fee waivers on ALL his cases), and I would love to nail this man to the wall.   Bottom feeding scumbag!   I would be interested in how your proceedings go.
  • post pending moderator approval
  • 0
    Christina M Estrada replies to scarecrow
    I too have received this and have been paying for over 2 1/2 years. I changed my card number and was unable to reach him. Number disconnected. Finally months later I got a summons and he tacked on another $800. Have been trying to call him but number is disconnected. Reported it as fraud to my bank. Can't believe I am so stupid.
  • 0
    Tree replies to mvgordie
    How did this end up bc he just contacted me for 12 year old debt.
  • 0
    Mr Big
    | 1 reply
    Just received a text from this number inquiring about transportation of a motor vehicle
    Is this legit ?
  • 0
    MikeHuntleton replies to Mr Big
    The lack of details about the call makes it difficult to determine if its legit or not. A simple search reveals this number goes to Sentry Adr Services (Arbitration and Conciliation Service) and has been one of their numbers for at least the past 5 years. Source
    It is always a possibility the number is being spoofed by some criminal or someone simply called/texted you by mistake, so without further details of your caller, no one can help you decide if it is a legitimate call or not.

Report a phone call from 951-227-6267:

The company that called you.