U.S. Do-Not-Call Violators Penalized $7.7 Million

The Federal Trade Commission announced on Wednesday a law enforcement crackdown on companies and individuals accused of violating the requirements of the National Do Not Call (DNC) Registry, resulting in six settlements collectively imposing nearly $7.7 million in civil penalties, along with an additional complaint that will be filed in federal district court.

The actions are against adjustable bed seller Craftmatic Industries, Inc. (Craftmatic), alarm-monitoring provider ADT Security Services (ADT), lender Ameriquest Mortgage Company (Ameriquest), and other companies.

The Complaints and Stipulated Orders

Craftmatic. According to the FTC, Craftmatic and three of its subsidiaries run sweepstakes promotions offering consumers who filled out an entry form the chance to win a prize – a Craftmatic bed. The sweepstakes form indicated that the consumers’ telephone number was their entry number as well. Using this information, Craftmatic allegedly placed tens of thousands of calls to consumers who entered the sweepstakes, even though the form did not indicate that by filling it out they would receive sales calls, and the company did not seek their express consent to call them. In addition, the Commission’s complaint charges Craftmatic with placing millions of abandoned calls to consumers. That is, the company did not connect consumers to a live representative within two seconds of when consumers said “hello,” leaving them to find only dead air upon answering. Finally, the FTC alleges Craftmatic ignored consumers’ requests to be placed on the company’s entity-specific do not call list. In settling the complaint, Craftmatic has agreed to pay a $4.4 million civil penalty – the second-largest ever for DNC-related violations.

ADT. The FTC charged ADT and two of its authorized dealers – Alarm King and Direct Security Services (DSS) – with violations similar to those alleged against DirecTV in 2005. ADT marketed its security systems directly to consumers and through authorized dealers, which used a variety of marketing techniques, including telemarketing. In telemarketing its services, ADT, Alarm King, and Direct Security Services each called consumers whose numbers were on the DNC Registry. While the authorized dealers used their own telemarketers, the FTC alleged that ADT is liable both for the sales calls it made, as well as those made by its dealers, to numbers on the Registry. In settling the separate complaints, ADT, Alarm King, and DSS have agreed to pay $2 million, $20,000, and $25,000, respectively.

Ameriquest. According to the complaint, Ameriquest’s telemarketers improperly called consumers on the Registry whose numbers had been obtained from third-party lead-generators. The lead generators enticed consumers to provide their contact information, including phone numbers, using Web sites that offered information on financial and other products. The FTC’s complaint states that because consumers whose numbers were on the lead lists were not reaching out to Ameriquest in particular, the company had not developed an “established business relationship” with them, making calls to registered numbers illegal. Ameriquest also allegedly also ignored consumers’ requests to be placed on its entity-specific do not call list.

In settling the charges, Ameriquest will pay a $1 million civil penalty and is required to ensure that any lead generators it uses disclose to consumers, before they provide their contact information, that they will receive a phone call, the maximum number of sellers who may contact them, and, if possible, the identity of any seller that might call them as a result of their inquiry.

Guardian Communications. The FTC charged Guardian, U.S. Voice Broadcasting with violating the Registry rules related to the use of pre-recorded messages. The complaint alleges that Guardian “blasted” phone numbers with pre-recorded telemarketing pitches, immediately terminating calls when a live consumer answered, leaving “dead air”and giving them no opportunity to ask to be placed on the company’s entity-specific no-call list. The Commission also charged the Guardian defendants with failing to transmit accurate Caller ID information to consumers – instead transmitting the text “Cust Service,” “Services, Inc.,” “Card Services,” “DWC,” or “LTR” as the name of the caller – and placing calls on behalf of sellers that did not pay for access to the Registry. They will pay $150,000 to settle the FTC’s charges, with the remainder of the $7.8 million civil penalty judgment suspended based on their inability to pay.

Global Mortgage Funding. FTC will pursue charges against Global Mortgage Funding for making hundreds of thousands of calls to consumers on the DNC Registry in an attempt to sell financial products. The Commission’s complaint also charges the defendants with failing to transmit the required caller ID information, failing to pay the DNC Registry fees, and abandoning calls by failing to connect consumers to a representative within two seconds after they answered the phone.

Recognizing its importance to consumers, the Commission recently announced that it will not remove telephone numbers from the Registry, pending final Congressional or agency action regarding whether to make registration permanent.

“Consumers have made clear that they greatly value the Do Not Call Registry, and they must be able to depend on its privacy protection,” said FTC Chairman Deborah Platt Majoras. “By bringing enforcement actions, like those announced today, we will ensure that the small number of bad actors pay a price for not adhering to the law and respecting consumers’ privacy requests.”

Comments

  • 0
    About time!
    | 3 replies
    This is a good start but more needs to be done. Close the loopholes which allow charties, collection agencies, political callers and surveys to keep calling. If they call 4 times in a month and no one answers they should not be allowed to call again. Prohibit hangup calls, make them leave a message and proper Caller ID info or require they state their name, address and specific purpose. Prohibit auto-dialers and calls where only a prerecorded message is left. Stop these jerks from whining about their First Amendment rights. No one has a right to free speech when they call me inside my PRIVATE residence! Collection agencies would also do much better if they sent out letters to people who owe them money. If anyone says I owe them money and I dont believe it I am going to say provc it in writing. I can turn off my TV or computer, email or US mail doesnt bother me because I can just delete or throw out, but allowing anyone the right to call my phone and cause it to ring inside MY house is an invasion of privacy in my opinion. I hope to see MANY more fines in the future.
  • 0
    Marie
    I agree it is a start i now I do my best to get all info i can when I get a call and waste No time reporting as much as i can.
    I wish they could do soemthing about the scammers that call all the time claiming they are from acocunt services (never gives WHAT account) and offer a lower interest rate
    i have tried to get further info and can not It scares me how many folks may ge tricked with this one and give bank info
    Those are the jerks i wish someone would do something about i have call traced (at 1.00 a pop mind you from MY pocket) 3 times now, contacted Verizon, and authorites but it keeps happening
  • 0
    Action
    You know what gets me here is that these are not small businesses trying to make a sell or two. The people mentioned above are big and well respected companies in business for many, many years. Unbelievable. ADT, Craftmatic? You would think these folks would know the rules. Better yet, you would think they would not want to conduct business like this and annoy the consumers. They have made themselves look shady. What idiots.
  • 0
    Scott
    7.7 Million is a rounding error on the books of these companies...
  • 0
    me
    This is a really good start.  I have to agree with the first responder that more has to be done about this situation.  I'm glad to hear that the companies that call someone who is on the Do Not Call list will be penalized heavily.  I am hoping that there will no longer be telemarketing calls in the future.
  • 0
    Robb replies to About time!
    | 1 reply
    yep.  Close the loopholes, but they won't becuase soo many f'ing special interests are in bed with other people throughout this country.
  • 0
    Eric F
    | 2 replies
    On a further Note-  Do Not Call Registry has a form to fill out and report violators.  Abuse it.  Lets get these companies to finally follow the law for once.

    https://www.donotcall.gov/complaint/complaintcheck.aspx
  • 0
    Don replies to Eric F
    | 1 reply
    Better to use FCC form 1088 than the do not call form. The do not call complaint form is a waste of time, and they essentially tell you that. The FCC form actually files a formal complaint, which gets a little action.

    More detail is asked for, but worth it.

    https://esupport.fcc.gov/form1088/consumer.do
  • 0
    Chris replies to Don
    My question is, who benefits from the fines? We dont receive a share? We are the ones being harassed, but just like big business, the government retains all monies collected, big suprise!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • 0
    Jay replies to Robb
    Unfortunately, Craftmatic makes comfy beds...lol
  • 0
    NKS
    This is getting too much: distracting, annoying, even disturbing and all unwanted calls. No matter how "insignificant" this issue might sound to some or how some others deliberately paint this issue as such, this is NOT a problem of annoyance only.

    Ability to place unidentifiable calls, for instance, is used widely not only by "innocent" marketers, but for criminal purposes, which makes the little benefit of it actually unimportant, and which has to give the Government legitimate grounds for taking appropriate centralized measures to protect individual and public safety. Existing laws has to be corrected and/or new law(s) have to be introduced for this matter, equal to individuals, companies and organizations, with possible rare exceptions for law enforcement and government only and only under special circumstances.

    Here are some ideas:

    - ALL calls have to be identifiable. Caller ID and Name (Company Name) have to be displayed (real, legally obtained, listed, and that could be tracked back). Calls from public phones/booths have to display appropriate IDs/numbers.

    - Technology has to adapt to satisfy mandatory identification. (E.g.: existing devices that currently enable ID suppression have to be rendered unable to place calls without positive identification; an attempt to use such device and/or method has to be tracked and recorded at a service provider level; etc.)

    - Any attempt to fake an ID/Name, use someone else’s ID/Name, illegally obtain and use right to hide Caller ID and Name has to be deemed as a punishable offense.

    If a person, company or organization is legal and honest there should be no reason to hide their identity. By keeping themselves “private” they are actually violating other’s peace and privacy. (E.g., one can not drive a car without a valid license plate, or enter a plane without a valid passport/ID, etc. Calling without a Caller ID/Name has to be viewed as knocking someone’s door with a full face cover mask and costume on.)

    Regards,

    NKS
  • 0
    Robert replies to About time!
    "Your freedom ends where mine begins" is a phrase I am reminded of.
  • 0
    rickm
    I have found one way to combat the charity calls. If they call I tell them to remove me from all forms of contact. I don't mind letters, I can recycle them . But a call at 9pm on a Sunday night? Screw you.

    The worst offenders are the police/fire charities. I had one guy tell me that they were exempt from the list.
  • 0
    DoubleStandards
    NKS..  Agree..  the double standards..   Your safety and privacy is way below the the need for a company to make a dime..
  • 0
    Zulu2Ed_CA
    Remember, you are at risk if you-Give out your name and telephone number to:
    *Contests you enter at the mall, on the Web, just about any contest
    *A Magazine or Newspaper Subsription that wants your telephone number
    *Computer programs that ask you to enter your phone number and name
    *Web Sites that ask for the same, including Internet Email address suppliers.
    *Survey's whether online or hard copy including Mailed Postal ones
    *Raffles, Lotteries that need your name & tel number
    *Warranty Cards, Medical Survey's, Free Diabetes Testing Meter's etc.

    These people often sell your information to one another. This can be quite profitable for them and of course quite annoying for you when your name or number is sold around the globe. Imagine one outfit sells your information for just .25 cents 5000 times, that's $1,250.00 in their pocket!

    *IF YOU ARE CALLED MORE THAN (3) THREE TIMES IN A 24 HOUR TIME PERIOD YOU CAN REPORT THE NUMBER TO YOUR TELEPHONE PROVIDER AS HARRASSMENT. (A Criminal Code of Canada Charge CCC)
    *THE LIST IS ALMOST INFINITE, so always please USE EXTREME CAUTION

Post a comment