8882263625

Just got an interview from one of the companies united job placement found me. Only complaint I have is they hounded me a bit, but oh well i've got an interview now. Not sure what mostly everyone is saying here, are you guys paranoid debtors or something?

Just got an interview from one of the companies united job placement found me. Only complaint I have is they hounded me a bit, but oh well i've got an interview now. Not sure what mostly everyone is saying here, are you guys paranoid debtors or something?

If everyone needs to chill out, then why is it that there are 15-20 negative comments to each positive comment?  If it is not a scam, then why is the number unable to be tracked on a reverse look up?  What exactly was your package?  It is still fishy and any reputable entity would not perform business in this fashion.

well here is the big question guys or should i say guy; if you don't have a complaint or at least concerned about the number what in the hell or you doing on this site. i think you typed in your own number.  and why does a dilivery company and a job placement company got the same number. its because they're full of it and so are you.

18882263625  this number called and my voice mail answered... there was a guy on the other side but he only was singing very low, like waiting for someone to pick up the phone. I have gotten calls from a similar number that claimed to be a job placement agancy.

I do think  it is some kind of collection agency with a new strategey, I don't think they should be misrepresenting themselves like this.

ok for the one's that keep writing theres nothing to be paranoid about. You guys are the people that are calling us and it is illegal for you to represent something you are not. So for all who are calling my job house etc... I garantee not only will you lose your jobs you will also be in prison. This is not professional at all. If you are collecters good keep calling and let us know don't lie and say your some one else

The address information they recited on the pack age label didn't match the address I order with. Chill out?!!, No way pal!! I told them what they can do with it.

I agree, it is beyond the shadow of a doubt obvious that that's whats going on. Also yes, I second that the ones who are giving good replies here are employees. Nice try Bozos.

One person from national express delivery told me that they were working in an office space with a job placement agency. said something that their phones were messed up and someone was looking into it. I am posting not for a scam but because they hounded me relentlessly until i spoke with them.

Maybe we are maybe we aren't, lots of tricks up our sleeves though debtors.

Called my husband asking form reference from someone we did not know. One day later called my neibohr asking my husband reference

called to verify employment of one of our men, said she was from United Rental and verified the social security number they had.  Now I look it up on thte internet and it's not United Rental, that was a lie.

This company is a fraud and involved in illegal activity.  For the person who says that they received a package and or a job shut up because you probally work for them.  These creeps called my school today pretending to be me trying to verify my enrollment.  Then they called my husband stating that they were trying to verify my address to deliver a package.  what I have not ordered anything, do not owe any huge debt these people are pathetic!  I called my local police department and filed charges against them, I called my state attorney office and filed charges there also, I also called the Federal fraud hotline and filed an complaint there.  They stated that they are going to research it.  What they are doing is fraudulent which is a felony and if and when they are caught they will go to jail.  By the way they called my school and husband from 1-888-226-3625 and left this number for me to call back 866-796-3942 once I left a message b/c no one ever answers stating that I know that they are committing fraud they blocked my number so that I could not call back.  So I used another phone number and left a message telling them to deliver the package to the local police department because there is a fraud detective there waiting to arrest them.  Someone should research them because this is probally a voice over IP toll free number which anyone can set up at their home.  It is not as easy to trace but with some effort we can help this pricks seek their destiny "in federal jail".  I am going to have one of my friends look into it.

Yesterday, I received a voicemail msg from "Karen Johnson", saying she had a returned parcel that they need to deliver to me, and when would be a good time.  She left the number 866-506-1142, which she said was her direct line.  Turns out, the number goes to Nationwide Courier Service, but no one ever answers the phone, you just leave your name and number and they're supposed to call you back. I googled Nationwide Courier Service, there is no such company, just many other couriers that offer 'nationwide courier service'.
Today, the same lady called back, this time her name was Karen Smith.  She asked when I'd be home so they could deliver the package.  She said it would be delivered by a guy named Danny driving a white van.  I asked her what company she worked with, she replied we are A1 Courier Service, we work through UPS.  Caller ID said UPS Store. I called the UPS store and asked about all this, the guy had never heard of her or them.  She probably just went to the UPS Store and used one of their phones.

nope it aint against the law

Angela  extension 934, called for my daughter yesterday. She said there is a package, prepaid and valued at $149 from Macys that is to be delivered for my daughter but they need to know she is at this address before they can deliver it. I live in MN. I told her that she is now living in CA (I lied) and she said "what is her address so we can deliver it?" I asked her why if it is on the delivery truck in MN now, why would they drive all the way to CA to deliver it?
Apparently is is a gift for her but they could deliver it to ME if I know my daughters security number. How stupid could this get??  It sounded so bogus that I kept egging her on. I am pretty sure they are trying to find her to deliver papers or something. My daughter tried calling this number back and it is disconnected....

Right. I believe it has to. If practices like this become legal you all better start carrying guns with you. This is just another example of how big business and corporations have taken over our government and usurped our right to freedom from this sort of harassment. Credit collection agencies our the bottom feeders of society and frankly I hope you all get just what's coming to you in the very near future. If you have a package for me I'll have you deliver it about 10 acres in to my propriety at around three in the morning. And by the way, go f%$# yourself.

By the way, here's a little law for you bottom feeding scum...............

15 USC 1692f
§ 808. Unfair practices
A debt collector may not use unfair or unconscionable means to collect or attempt to collect any debt. Without limit- ing the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section:
§ 808
15 USC 1692f
(1) (2)
(3)
(4) (5)
(6)
The collection of any amount (including any interest, fee, charge, or expense incidental to the principal obli- gation) unless such amount is expressly authorized by the agreement creating the debt or permitted by law.
The acceptance by a debt collector from any person of a check or other payment instrument postdated by more than five days unless such person is notified in writing of the debt collector’s intent to deposit such check or instrument not more than ten nor less than three busi- ness days prior to such deposit.
The solicitation by a debt collector of any postdated check or other postdated payment instrument for the purpose of threatening or instituting criminal prosecu- tion.
Depositing or threatening to deposit any postdated check or other postdated payment instrument prior to the date on such check or instrument.
Causing charges to be made to any person for com- munications by concealment of the true propose of the communication. Such charges include, but are not limited to, collect telephone calls and telegram fees.
Taking or threatening to take any nonjudicial action to effect dispossession or disablement of property if—
(A) there is no present right to possession of the prop- erty claimed as collateral through an enforceable security interest;
(B) there is no present intention to take possession of the property; or
(C) the property is exempt by law from such disposses- sion or disablement.
10
(7)    Communicating with a consumer regarding a debt by post card.
(8)    Using any language or symbol, other than the debt col- lector’s address, on any envelope when communicating with a consumer by use of the mails or by telegram, except that a debt collector may use his business name if such name does not indicate that he is in the debt col- lection business.

Make sure you read it and get real familiar with it. Misrepresentation is a violation of the fair credit act and is in FACT not legal. Educate yourselves because it's the best weapon to use against these lowest of the low.

The stories of artful techniques of serving are numerous, of course, and they are discussed among legal scholars and law students. Defendants have been tagged by servers delivering flowers, talking their way into board meetings, even posing as exotic dancers sent to perform at office birthday parties.

Irving Botwinick, who runs Serving by Irving, a New York City process server, says, "In this business, you can legally lie to get to where you want to go as long as you don't break any laws."

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1154/is_n10_v81/ai_14215981/

A man's wife decided to leave him. Even if he couldn't dodge the divorce, he tried to dodge the paperwork. A dance of deception began.

New York State law requires spouses be personally served with documents informing them of divorce proceedings, so the husband avoided the process server hired by his wife's attorney to deliver said documents. He left his house at odd hours, ignored the doorbell, etc.

Service was delayed, but not denied.

Alex Shafran, vice president at Freeport's Tri-State Judicial Services Inc., eventually smoked him out - with a phony phone call. Posing as a neighbor, one of Shafran's servers called the man and told him someone was breaking into his car. The man emerged, and bingo.

Yes, Shafran's representative lied. And yes, it's legal. In fact, it's business-as-usual in process serving, this legal system limbo where people must be personally served with papers they'd like to avoid. All's fair - or almost all - in this rarely examined and largely self-regulated profession.

Process servers - earning as little as $5 per case or as much as $250 an hour in celebrity cases - use hook-or-crook methods to deliver papers for civil suits, foreclosures, divorces, deadbeat spouses and paternity cases. But if the person being served feels tricked, it's because they've been avoiding it, Shafran said. We don't start out trying to trick people.

Although trickery is part of the business, there are rules. A server might deliver papers with a bouquet of flowers, for instance, but can't stick the papers inside the bouquet.

If you hand flowers in one hand and a summons in another, that's not trickery, said Larry Yellon, president of Intercounty Judicial Services in Mineola and chairman of the New York State Professional Process Server Association's education committee. If you try to hide it inside, that's trickery. And that's not legal.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4189/is_20060714/ai_n16543752/