I am having difficulty finding the amazing, civilized, or responsible parts of the two clumsily composed entries by DPIF, now approaching a year old. This was a painfully typical kneejerk response which inevitably sprouts like a weed in forum discussions of debt problems, right down to the sloppy writing and insulting attitude.
Parachuting into a thread and cursing at everyone without even registering the context of discussion are not the actions of someone interested in rational exchange. With a user handle like "Debt Paid In Full", he'd already made up his mind and come to install a bully pulpit. There are plenty of cheap blogger sites which will host his broadcast rants if that's all he wants from the writing exercise.
Lone Stranger did an exemplary job of unpacking this forum jamming, which very often comes from collections industry shills as much as self-righteous uber-patriots who think that a zero balance is next to Godliness. They share a pervasive and faulty assumption that all debt is created through voluntary consumer action. The same assumption extends to a belief that all debtors are "bad people" and deserve any punishment, no matter how fraudulent or illegal or destructive to one's quality of life.
You will not find anyone in discussions like this who is cackling madly with unholy glee and bragging about what a deep screwing the lender in question got over a few hundred dollars in billing. You will also not find much agreement with the old canards of "Debtors are the reason for a failing economy" and "Debtors are the same as thieves". These are truly topics for a longer work, which Stranger and I and others have scratched at right along.
I personally recommend a comprehensive report issued a year ago by the National Consumer Law Center for a primer on the many facets of the consumer debt crisis.
"The Debt Machine" --
www.nclc.org/images/pdf/pr-reports/debt-machine.pdfWhat the kneejerkers always miss is that if you want to promote "responsible" borrowing you must first have responsible lending, something which the Too Piggish To Fail banks have long ago classified as the slowest, worst way to turn a profit. This is why the honest borrower is a "deadbeat" and the sucker near or past default gets all the dysfunctionally loving attention.
Now, did anyone agree to Sears Credit terms with a gun to her spine? No, but the card "benefit" was likely sold across a counter by a Clearasil queen who cannot herself write a check without parental guidance, yet is playing financial advisor under strict orders from a floor manager who is baffled by the 'percent' key on a calculator. The card contract was likely full of language written in ant tracks to thoroughly disfavor the consumer, and was hurriedly amended each time the lender found it did not disfavor the customer enough.
I have written elsewhere in this thread about much of the Sears debt portfolio being uncollectably distressed. Surely Citi Group did not become the new underwriter in total ignorance of signifiers that too many accounts were very suspect if not outright bogus. Surely the worst performing accounts would not have been packaged and sold to hostile and lawbreaking junk debt buyers if they weren't already too poisonous to keep in-house.
Please, please let's not try to conclude that all of the aggravation and abuse which naturally flows from such a broken and lopsided credit system, in which absolutely everything that goes wrong is somehow labeled Someone Else's Problem in the chain of handlers, should rightfully come straight back to yoke the shoulders of the end user, who is stuck disentangling a mess of evasive phone calls and deliberately confusing documents.
When you have an industry which *thrives* on the decay of its customers, you cannot draw a one-to-one relationship between your neighbor's unpaid debt and your own perceived higher cost of credit. Such an industry will find a way to unfairly burden everyone no matter *what* everyone's spending and repayment behavior is. This is not the proper space, nor is there enough, for me to describe from personal experience how this is so, but I know from ongoing industry study how very much mine are not accidental or uncommon cases.
Reply to topic