"Celebrating" The Do Not Call's 10th Anniversary

This summer, the national Do Not Call Registry, managed by the Federal Trade Commission, turned 10 years old, and there are now a whopping 221 million phone numbers in the registry.

But the calls keep coming. Telemarketing complaints at the FTC have risen from 150,393 in 2003 to nearly 4 million last year (roughly 2 million of those were robocall complaints). At the FCC, the number of robocall concerns has doubled in the past two years, reaching 100,000 in 2012.

So who is it to blame? Caroline Mayer from Forbes says it's the technology, and I agree.  

It drastically lowered the cost of long-distance calls to less than a penny per minute, created automated dialers that can blast out thousands of solicitations a minute, and also allowed callers to hide their identity via "caller ID spoofing".

To try stemming the illegal telemarketing tide, the FTC recently sponsored a Robocall Challenge, awarding $50,000 to tech ideas the agency thought had the most promise for blocking robocalls. The three winners conceived automated algorithms to identify, intercept and filter out illegal prerecorded calls that would be placed on a blacklist and are trying to sell these computerized programs to U.S. phone companies.

So, let's wait and see if the same technology helps consumers detect and block unwanted calls for good. Until then, make the violations known and public by reporting the illegal calls here at 800notes and to the FTC.

Comments

  • -5
    wally
    | 61 replies
    If you're serious about stopping these crooks, go to every contest and PDL site you can find and enter the personal info of local and national news and political celebrities--especially members of Congress.   Once they start getting endless "pay your loan" and Rachel calls, the problem will get solved pretty quickly, I suspect.
  • +7
    Resident47 replies to wally
    | 24 replies
    You're assuming that the wealthy, famous, and elected answer their own phones. They "have people" to run interference.
  • +8
    Regulus
    | 43 replies
    99.9 % of Telemarketing Calls are generated from a Computer. It would be nice if someone came out with a Telephone Answering Machine that could determine if a call was from a Human Being or a Computer. In the case of a Computer, the phone wouldn't ring, and the call would be directed to a message saying "This Household doesn't answer Computer-Generated Calls, and your call will not be recorded, please take this number off your list. Goodbye!

    The person who invents such a machine will be the next billionaire.
  • +6
    wally replies to Resident47
    | 12 replies
    Back in 2009, when auto warranty robocalls were ubiquitous, a couple of these calls went to the cell phones of US senators, one was to Chuck Schumer while attending a senate committee meeting.  http://consumerist.com/2009/05/11/car-warrant ... n-capitol-hill/  It made the national news and suddenly the FTC was "all over it," though these calls had been going on for at least two years.    

    Once Indian call centers start harassing politicos and  media heavies, to "pay your [nonexistant] loans,"  the spotlight will be on  PDL and other scams and the offending governments who willfully tolerate them (India, Nigeria, Eastern Europe, Jamaica, Dominican Republic etc etc etc)  will start hearing about it.
  • +9
    Resident47 replies to wally
    Right, I'd forgotten the Schumer incident. Still I hope your vengeful redirection idea was meant in jest. It could have unwanted side effects on both sides of the phone.

    This doesn't relate to DNC, but does get at my point. We had a state rep here who got bent out of shape because debt collectors were calling her about a relative. The FDCPA already mandates silence from an agency if it gets that demand in writing from the alleged debtor, and nothing was stopping this lady from sending her own "shut up" letter. Instead she decided to draft a bill outlawing collection calls on Sundays. The bill's language hinted that she really hadn't done her homework first.

    The bill fizzled early, and with good reason. It was entirely about legislating her own quiet time and did nothing to curb real industry abuses. Between the lines of the news stories, one could see a messy family drama was embarrassing her. Kneejerk laws driven by emotion are those we can least afford.
  • +2
    Resident47 replies to Regulus
    | 14 replies
    How do you propose to prevent false positives? Innocuous notification calls are also autodialed, such as from CodeRED, pharmacies with prepared orders, and airlines with schedule changes.

    Gadgets for call screening need to be separate and not integrated. They have an alarmingly rapid rate of obsolescence as telco tech evolves and illegal callers develop ways to defeat whatever the blocker du jour may be. Rather like shareware, there isn't a lot of money in those things since the development effort can be laborious, which is never reflected in the competitive prices they bear to simply attract a market at all.
  • 0
    FED UP WITH DNC
    | 3 replies
    I have given up on the DNC list, as I have done it purposely, submitting my number and assuming they were selling my number. Sure enough, each time i did this my telemarketing/unsolicited calls increased300% immediately. Beware of giving your number to the DNC unless you want telemarketers to literally drive you crazy within days of DNC selling your number!!!
  • +5
    stan replies to FED UP WITH DNC
    | 1 reply
    I don't think they're selling it per se, I think criminals download the DNC list and use it as a  data base of valid, active numbers.   The DNC only works if telemarketers voluntarily comply with its terms.   Unfortunately, the number of bad actors who use the list for exactly the opposite purpose for which it was intended appears far larger than anyone imagined when the DNC was first inaugurated.   Apparently relying on the good intentions of the telemarketing industry wasn't a good idea.
  • 0
    Gail
    Canada here and we have do not call list. There is  supposed to  be a privacy  act here too. The calls are always there. Want to buy this. You owe money and we need to identify your info. All coming from unknown name unknown number. I don't answer those. Leave a message is so important. Rarely done.
  • +3
    savannah43 replies to Resident47
    | 3 replies
    The phone companies should be responsible for this. Not their customers.
  • -1
    wally replies to Regulus
    Google Voice.    you can send my billion care of post
  • +4
    Eilish
    | 2 replies
    The FTC REFUSES to act against these callers. Every time I have reported these calls I get a letter from the FTC saying there is nothing they can do. Absolutely useless organization.
  • -1
    Wilbur Smithson
    | 3 replies
    I get numerous calls on all my numbers, business, cell, and home, from 978-228-9682.  Caller id on one phone showed the name Nanah.  I've done research and discovered a couple things about 978-228-9682.  One, the number originates back to India, but the other is that it is either owned by Verizon or T-Mobile.  So, it's very confusing.  I changed one of my numbers because this person calls all day long and all night long, spamming with calls.  After I changed the one number and made it private, somehow Nanah found my new number and called again. I called the FBI about it but they said there was nothing they could do because I have had no physical threats.  I call the number back and either get voice mail or no one picks up.  I did once call from a pay phone in the area where the number originates, which is either Haverhill, MA or Methuen, Mass.  I was visiting family and thought I'd give it a shot.  Some woman did pick up the phone.  I asked kindly if she would stop calling me but she said she had no idea what I was talking about and hung up.  978-228-9682 is trouble and should be a way to find out who it is at the other end and put them in jail.
  • +3
    Walker
    As I see it, we are in a war against the spammers, scammers, phishers, and all the rest for our privacy and peace of mind. That is definitely something worth fighting for!
  • +1
    Mikie
    | 1 reply
    I guess with the sequester of federal spending there is no chance of the FTC stopping this nonsense.  It is strange, however, that the NSA is in trouble for knowing who is calling whom but the FTC is clueless even when provided thousands of clues.

Post a comment