Scooter Maker Fined $100,000 for Calling Consumers Using Phone Numbers Gathered From Sweepstakes

We are all familiar with the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule that allows a company to call a consumer, whose phone number is on the Do Not Call Registry, for up to 18 months if it has an “established business relationship” with the consumer and he or she has not asked the firm to stop calling.

But what is an Established Business Relationship?

The FTC says there are two kinds of established business relationships. One is based on the consumer’s purchase, rental, or lease of the seller’s goods or services, or a financial transaction between the consumer and seller, within 18 months preceding a telemarketing call.

The other is based on a consumer’s inquiry or application regarding a seller’s goods or services, and exists for three months starting from the date the consumer makes the inquiry or application.

It's important to note that according to the FTC's Rule, a completed sweepstakes entry form does not establish a business relationship with a consumer. In fact, the FTC has recently charged a scooter manufacturer, Electric Mobility Corporation, and its owner Michael Flowers with making more than 3 million illegal sales calls since 2003 to consumers with phone numbers on the Do Not Call List who had entered the company’s “Win a Free Rascal” sweepstakes.

Flowers will pay $100,000, and Electric Mobility is subject to a $2 million penalty, which is suspended based on its inability to pay.

Electric Mobility regularly encourages consumers to enter its sweepstakes through direct mail, newspapers and TV advertisements, which is how it managed to obtain millions of phone numbers, many of them on the registry.

According to the FTC, in the fine print under the section of the sweepstakes entry form allocated for the contestant's phone number, the company reminded consumers to list their phone number so the company could contact them in the event they became "the next lucky winner."

Nur-ul-Haq, a lawyer in the FTC's Northeast Region office, said that Electric Mobility's contest forms were insufficient to justify an exception to the "do not call" rules on either basis the company cited: that filling out the form amounted to an "express written consent" to be telephoned, or established an ongoing business relationship between the company and the contest entrants.

The New Jersey company admitted no wrongdoing in settling the case, the FTC said. "We have a disagreement on how to interpret the rules," said Flowers.

"The main point of this case was that by virtue of entering a sweepstakes, a consumer doesn't create an established business relationship with the merchant," Haq said.

Comments

  • 0
    Oh F@#$!
    "Flowers will pay $100,000, and Electric Mobility is subject to a $2 million penalty, which is suspended based on its inability to pay."

    How many times have we heard this.  The telemarketer pleads poverty and they end up paying chump change.  This company is regularly running television commercials; how much do you think they are paying for those?    Yet again, the wrongdoer escapes any significant punishment for their violations,  and they new exactly what they were doing.   Those "sweepstakes" scams are intended only to circumvent the DNC list so they could continue direct telemarketing to, lets all say it together: "the elderly and vulnerable"--every telemarketer's favorite target.   To Electric Mobility, this fine is just a very minor cost of doing business.   Is it any wonder the DNC is treated like a joke by the telemarketing industry?
  • 0
    Been there, done that....
    This is just like the displays at the mall claiming that you'll win a new car by putting your name and phone number on an entry form.  All you ever "win" is a phone call from a time share resort wanting to pitch you a 90 minute presentation where they want to sell you a timeshare.  Sure, by law they are required to give away one car a year, but beware of the displays with the new cars.  Always, always read the fine print on the bottom of the entry form and on the back of them as well.
  • 0
    econobiker
    "Flowers will pay $100,000, and Electric Mobility is subject to a $2 million penalty, which is suspended
    based on its inability to pay."

    I am sure that the "Electric Mobility Corporation" is bankrupted and sold its assets to a company named something like "The Mobile Electric Scooter Corporation" also owned by Michael Flowers....
  • 0
    Ty
    That is interesting. My mom has been getting phone calls from a company who obtained her number through sweepstakes. She feels powerless because she gave the number herself. I will let her know. It's war!
  • +1
    Been there, done that...
    | 1 reply
    Entering a sweepstakes give the owner of the contest permission to call you because you willingly gave a name, address and telephone number.  If it is a legitimate sweepstakes, they can  notify you by mail (or email if you chose to put that down).  Like my post above, when you fill out any entry form, always read the fine print on the bottom of the form - or on the back if the disclaimer is there because it will clearly state that you are giving permission for the contest owner to call you.  And also, legitimate contests will have an in-house DNC list that they are to put you on if you tell them to do so.  My information comes first hand.  I worked for a timeshare company who bought lists as well as got the information from contest entry forms.  When I would call and the person told me to put their number on the DNC list, I would do it and tear up their name and phone number so no one else on the floor could call it.  I no longer do telemarketing, and it wasn't for me since I was able to take "No" for an answer!
  • 0
    Barb
    | 1 reply
    I also got an electronic withdrawl from my US bank account for 29.95. I tried calling the phone #, after numerous tries I got an automated answer from Verizon,giving me several options= do you want to join a group, doyou want to get in contact with a group, etc. then gave me a fake [non listed ,not a working #] if I had any questions. Tried to call the orig. # now it was a non working #. Whats the deal ? I want my 29.95 back, is there any possability? Help! I can't afford to let this happen again.   Thank You, Barb
  • 0
    TJ replies to Barb
    call your bank and explain it to them that it was unauthorised. They will investigate and refund.
  • 0
    Jayde Morgan
    NO, calls from this number have nothing to do with people who have advertised on Craigs' List. For one thing I'd never go near C L; people who use it are often scammed, spammed, and just generally not left alone.
    I never used Craigs' List. But I got the call anyway. Will people now please stop saying things like "It's your own fault; you used Craigs' List??"
    PLEASE. We are not that stupid.
    These recordings are just the marketer's way to try to get around the Do Not Call (DNC) Registry. If the caller speaks English *(rare) and if the person being bothered with this BS claims to be on the DNC the caller whines "Well I can't help that; the numbers are dialed by computer."

    BULL, "they can't help it." They can help it. They just don't want to. Might be a sucker out there who will fall for the scam.
  • 0
    Iz
    Why is everybody making such a fuss? Easy to avoid all this. First, if you have caller ID, don't answer any call with an unlisted or no listed number or number or name you don't recognize. If it is really important, they'll leave a voice message.

    Also, don't fall for the phishing scams listed by these other folks. Don't register for a free lesson. Don't enter your name for a sweepstakes. These are all only to get your name and number for sales followups.

    Time you realize that you get nothing for nothing and companies are not in business to give things away. You are just a mark and the goal is to get your cash.  Period.
  • 0
    John
    In case after case of sales organizations that use the sweepstakes ruse as a means of skirting the Do-Not-Call regulations the FTC has taken remedial action and have repeatedly ruled that sweepstakes entry forms, not-with-standing the alleged fine print disclosures, do not waive the consumers’ privacy rights under the DNC legislation. Yet Sundance Vacations aka SunScam Vacations, continues to defy the DNC regulations! What does that say about the ethics and integrity of the company? It says that Sundance Vacations doesn't care about what may be illegal or unethical; they only care about what they can get away with!

    (1) http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/04/rascal.shtm

    (2) http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/01/westgate.shtm

    (3) http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/11/dncpress.shtm
  • 0
    John replies to Been there, done that...
    In case after case of sales organizations that use the sweepstakes ruse as a means of skirting the Do-Not-Call regulations the FTC has taken remedial action and have repeatedly ruled that sweepstakes entry forms, not-with-standing the alleged fine print disclosures, do not waive the consumers’ privacy rights under the DNC legislation. Yet Sundance Vacations aka SunScam Vacations, continues to defy the DNC regulations! What does that say about the ethics and integrity of the company? It says that Sundance Vacations doesn't care about what may be illegal or unethical; they only care about what they can get away with!!!

    (1) http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2011/04/rascal.shtm

    (2) http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2009/01/westgate.shtm

    (3) http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/11/dncpress.shtm
  • 0
    John
    See the Boycott Sundance Vacations Facebook page. (If the link does not work, just copy & paste it into your browser)

    https://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Sundance-Vacations/172805172735470
  • 0
    russki
    I like little boys, call me if you want to play 720-319-5508

Post a comment