CallerId4U, Inc. - Millions of Illegal Telemarketing Calls

} So, what does that tell you!

A second copy of the same post 22 minutes later tells me that you've no problem emulating the behavior of nuisance callers in this venue. Your attitude tells me that you're another My Way or the Highway preacher who believes in one-stroke solutions to complex problems. My records tell me that I'm almost sure we had this same argument in first quarter 2014 when your handle was "cd".

Much like Not Mike, I can count the illegal sales calls on two hands annually. My phone number, a hand-me-down from someone who was eventually sued for junk debt, was DNC-registered in July 2004, shortly after the line was installed. Cold sales callers don't bother me because I go out of my way not to expose my number to lead generation. Stretch your theory about the clammy palms of "the gov" to explain that, Poindexter.

Someone might make a plausible case that recent registrations signal fresh meat to fraudulent callers. But all they get for intel is that the number works, not that anyone will answer or a person behind it suits the profile of their ideal customer or victim. That's what marketing lead lists are for, relied upon by hawkers and charlatans long before any opt-out program from your "gov" existed.

Yippee for you if you think you found the secret sauce for your situation. Don't bark at me to buy a jar and quit insisting that correlation implies causation.

You are spamming the board and are a troll/shill.
1) SHILL - An accomplice of a hawker, gambler, or SWINDLER who acts  as an enthusiastic customer to entice or encourage others. A person who pretends to give an impartial endorsement of something in which they themselves have an interest.
And as a BONUS!
2)TROLL - Making a deliberately offensive or provocative  online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them.
☄

Regarding the original post, I looked through our caller ID and many of the numbers we'd been getting calls from are in those number blocks, all with a city/state listed in the caller ID.  The latest one was from "MINTO ND 701-248-1459" which I suspect is supposed to be MINOT.

“AND the GOV has your number now!”
Well, that is a big “Duh”, of course they have your number; you give it to them in order to sign up.  Out of curiosity, do you also see unmarked black helicopters flying around your house at night?  I have read through your rants on this thread and it appears you have been wrapping the tin foil around your head WAY TOO TIGHT!  Not only will it leave nasty marks the skin where it wrinkles, but it applies undo pressure to the brain which screws up thought processes.

“Did anyone ever notice that after you added your number to the do not call registry your scam calls went wayyy up in about a month or two?”
Nope, I noticed the exact opposite after I first signed up.

“So, what does that tell you!”
After reading all of your posts, it tells me that; at best, you are a paranoid loon, at worst you are in league with the very scam callers you are supposedly railing against.  In either case, you are off-topic for this thread.  Besides, why would a scammer want to add to their costs by buying phone lists from the Government, when they are most likely going to use robo-dialers (which can easily dial through all possible numbers) to place their calls anyway?  The only logical use for the numbers on the DNC lists would be to program the robo-dialers NOT to dial them.  If you had really thought about it, you would realize that phone numbers on the DNC lists are actually the worst targets for a phone based campaign (legitimate or otherwise.)  They are basically lists of phones belonging to people that do not want to be bothered by unwanted callers (enough so that they have expended the effort to register), who will be very un-receptive to the calls (because they not want to be bothered), and who will be the most likely to report the calls.
Assuming that what you say about your experiences with scam callers is true (and I have my doubts) it is more than likely a mere coincidence rather than evidence of a plot by scammers and/or the greediness of the Government.  As I stated before, your tin foil hat is too tight.

I think we need to move on from last night. Cause this is starting to become another "The Do Not Call List Does Work" thread. Lets not go down that road again.

If CAD says I should remove my dental fillings because the NSA use them to control my thoughts, should I do it?

"If CAD says I should remove my dental fillings because the NSA use them to control my thoughts, should I do it?"

No, because the NSA doesn't control your thoughts by beaming signals to your dental fillings.  They beam signals to the mind control nanochip which was injected into your body when you got a flu shot.

No you just provide the network for these crooks....

Like ANY government agency cares. ROFLMAF

The NSA cares.  It's the only government agency which actually listens to us.

Fillings have to be metal to get radio signals, the composite fillings won't work {grin}

But are they listening to the telescammers ?
After all, most of the ones we are getting are international calls !

Ladies and Gentlemen:  "When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

OK, so what does this have to do with this thread?  Simple.  If OUR government refuses to protect us and opts instead to deregulate in favor of business then we, as citizens, have the right to take matters into our own hands.  I suggest a four step, escalating approach.

1. Publicly out every officer/owner and every employee who works for CallerId4U with a call to action to harass and shame the living hell out of them by any legal means necessary.
2. Extend this treatment to their family, including their children as well.
3. Physical violence against the facilities.  Cut trunk lines and electrical power to call and data centers.  Anything at all to disrupt service.
4. As a last resort, disappear an officer.

Now, I do understand that the last two escalations call for actions deemed to be illegal.  However, as Thomas Jefferson said, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."  I would hope it doesn't come to that, but I am willing to give my blood if need be.  However, all this thread proves is that there is no remedy coming from our government, and that phone companies are not going to turn away business just because they are invading our privacy.  Now, who's with me?  Because we will need a sizable coalition in order to pull this off.

All four of your "ideas" are illegal. This type of stupidity is against the TOS of this site.

Looks like you will have to do this by yourself.