8558742607

SEPT. 25
Tina L. Windle, 463 Uncapher Ave., pleaded no contest to a charge of theft, found guilty, 180 days jail, 170 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Annette L. Lane, 6753 Gillette Road, Prospect, pleaded no contest to a charge of passing a bad check, 30 days jail, found guilty, 30 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Natasha H. Cooper, 779 Silver Street, pleaded no contest to a charge of theft, found guilty, 180 dayd jail, 180 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

James E. Disbennett, 3610 Ohio 309, Iberia, pleaded no contest to a charge of theft, found guilty, 30 days jail, 30 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Ryan M. Noe, 374 Hemston Drive, Gahanna, pleaded no contest to two charges of phone harassment, found guilty, 60 days jail, 60 suspended and an $800 fine, $500 suspended plus costs.

Darcy N. Huntley, 855 Congress St., pleaded no contest to a charge of disorderly conduct, found guilty, a $50 fine plus costs.

Lori S. Swartz, 1949 Harding Highway, pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct, found guilty, charged court costs.

Tiffany M. McGovern, 200 Center St., Ashley, pleaded no contest to a charge of theft, found guilty, 180 days jail, 170 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Jarod L. Morgan, 401 Park St., Marion, pleaded no contest to a charge of disorderly conduct while intoxicated, found guilty, a $50 fine plus costs.

Carrie L. Murphy, 470 Jefferson St., pleaded no contest to a charge of resisting arrest, found guilty, 30 days jail, 27 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Carl W. Brooker, 300 South Fremont St., New Bloomington, pled guilty to a charge of barking dogs, a $50 fine plus costs.

Kyle J. Norris, 1110 Blois Drive, pleaded no contest to a charge of disorderly conduct, found guilty, 30 days jail, 30 suspended and a $150 fine, $50 suspended plus costs.

Eric H. Ravitz, 1639 Marion Waldo Road, pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct, found guilty, a $50 fine plus costs.

Zachery J. Studer, 2918 Winnemac Pike, LaRue, pleaded no contest to a charge of drug abuse, found guilty, a $100 fine plus costs.

Anthony R. Weisenberger, 559 East George St., pleaded guilty to a charge of criminal damaging, 90 days jail, 90 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Tiffanie R. Brown, 262 Chicago Ave., pleaded no contest to a charge of theft, 90 days jail, 80 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Jamie S. Hamm, 187 Edwards St., pleaded no contest to a charge of child endangerment, 90 days jail, 90 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Carrie L. Williams, 356 Owens St., pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct while intoxicated, found guilty, a $50 fine plus costs.

John D. Persinger, Jr., 356 Owens St., pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct while intoxicated, found guilty, a $50 fine plus costs.

Nathan D. Laird, 283 Oak St., pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct while intoxicated, found guilty, a $50 fine plus costs.

Mark A. Galyk, 420 Blaine Ave., pleaded no contest to a charge of disorderly conduct while intoxicated, found guilty, a $50 fine plus costs.

Thomas A. Clarke, 333 Executive Drive, pleaded no contest to a charge of disorderly conduct while intoxicated, a $150 fine plus costs.

Justin A. Vanderhoff, 422 Carolyn Drive, pleaded guilty to a charge of failure to confine an animal, a $50 fine plus costs.

SEPT. 26
Gary L. Gamble Jr., 915 Bennett St., pleaded no contest to charges of unlawful restraint and sexual imposition, 340 days jail, 320 suspended and an $800 fine, $500 suspended plus costs.

Brandon L. Hickman, 249 Chicago Ave., pleaded no contest to a charge of drug abuse, a $150 fine, $100 suspended plus costs.

Antoine C. Young, 977 Paula Drive, pleaded guilty to a charge of disorderly conduct, a $150 fine, $100 suspended plus costs.

Raymond F. Morrow, 470 St. Gallen St., pleaded no contest to a charge of theft, found guilty, 180 days jail, 150 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Lonnie L. Potts, 350 Lee St., pleaded no contest to a charge of theft, found guilty, 90 days jail, 87 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Richa L. Patton, 762 Cheney Ave., pleaded no contest to a charge of complicity, 30 days jail, 30 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Caleb D. Reece, 628 Mount Vernon Ave., pleaded to a charge of disorderly conduct, found guilty, 30 days jail, 30 suspended and a $250 fine, $100 suspended plus costs.

Aaron M. Stoneburner, 286 Oak St., pleaded no contest to a charge of criminal damaging, found guilty, 90 days jail, 80 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

Jeanine L. Bosh, 174 North Grand Street, pleaded no contest to a charge of assault, 60 days jail, 57 suspended and a $400 fine, $250 suspended plus costs.

http://www.marionstar.com/article/20121105/NE ... l-court-records

Kansas Man Gets Prosecuted:

Pittsburg man pleads guilty in bad-check case



PITTSBURG, Kan. — A 25-year-old man pleaded guilty Tuesday to defrauding several businesses in Crawford County by writing worthless checks.

Kent Debusk, of Pittsburg, pleaded guilty at a hearing in Crawford County District Court to a felony count of theft by deception. He will be sentenced Dec. 18.

The defendant was arrested on the charge Oct. 12 following an investigation involving the Crawford County sheriff’s office and police in Pittsburg, Arma, Frontenac and Girard.

District Attorney Michael Gayoso said Debusk passed checks in August of this year at 16 businesses in five towns in the county. The checks were written on an account that had been opened with an amount of money insufficient to cover any of the checks, the prosecutor said. Rather than charge Debusk with several misdemeanor counts, the charges were rolled into a single felony count for prosecution, Gayoso said.

http://www.joplinglobe.com/crime_and_courts/x ... -bad-check-case

Is anyone here buying the product that this guy is selling?  I doubt that he is doing any good here because everyone who reads this thread can see what kind of person he is.  A desperate man.

That's just Joeey. Nobody pays him the slightest attention anymore. Except probably his creditors and several law enforcement agencies. He's so desperate he spends time here shilling and more time trying to find ways to validate his fraudulent existence. He would like you to believe that his bogus firm had something to do with all those bad check cases he posted. He hates the fact that we know better. He does not deal in legitimate or valid bad check charges. He specializes in un-collectable debt because that's the only kind he can afford. Ignore his slimy ass. He's is nothing but hot air and is about as intimidating as a Toy Poodle.

So What the hell does that proove?   One person charged with bad check?   Because they peaded no contest?
The rest are  all  disorderly conduct, burglary, sexual deviance, child endangerment etc.     and even with that most everyone pleaded no contest.  I'm looking for a collections connectin here...

How does this tie in with your rantings on this board about people paying pissy little checks written mostly out of SOL.
The man in your post:  Wrote checks to 16 businesses  in 5 towns?  Charges all rolled into one.
Hell,  he ought to have been shot!!!    How does this play into the collections game?
And do you think they will call out the S.W.A.T. team over granny's  10.00 check written in 1956?
You are a real case,  you are.

joey...HEY [removed:lang] were not talking about people who purposely wrote bad checks and yes they do belong in jail show me an article where somebody wrote a check to a store or utility company say for 30.00 in 1999 and now there being arrested for fraud...[removed:lang]..
PEOPLE all this [removed:lang] can do is show articles about people you purposely defrauded the system and thats all he has and again i do believe those people belong in jail and this [removed:lang] is trying to use those articles to scare you for your NSF check that you wrote out in the 1990s
THIS FOOL probably bought one of those GET RICH SCHEME and he is trying to get rich HAHAHA..
HEY [removed:lang] your not going to make a dime and that makes me very happy,show me a article where somebody was arrested for a 40.00 check in the 1990s and went to jail...[removed:lang]..
deliver newspapers little boy you would make more money then being a lying low life..RIGHT [removed:lang]

I don't see any connection to the art  of debt collections either.   As I read it,  the man was arrested on suspicion of  "FELONY BURGLARY"  and forgery.  Not writing a hot check.  He had forged a signature on a check that was believed to be fraudulent in the first place.........Were the police responding to a potential dangerous situation based upon the store keeps phone call,  or because a  collection/scammer  person served him papers,  at the store,  and had the vice come in for the take down?   Oh yes,  was the check still in SOL?

Gunnar,   in reading of all those charged,   I see only one person that was charged with writing a bad check.   A single person who  plead no contest..  Re-read what all the others were charged with and see if you can see any relevance in him posting their names........trying to make it look like half of St. Louis wrote hot checks.
To me,  that falls in line with the making of telephone threats and demands for payment without providing any written validation of the check or debts legal collectability.

Read this site and then wasn't going to pay, but when I called the LA BBB they said this was a legit company and they have a 96% success rate in having people prosecuted on cases they refer to the DA. Why would the BBB say this if it wasn't true???? I took care of my check, since I wrote it I figured better pay it and avoid jail.

http://www.la.bbb.org/business-reviews/Collec ... es-CA-100118372

Hey everybody!! Look who's here! Joeeey's baaaack!! Good try pal, now be sure to let everyone know that they'll be looking at the wrong info. Where do you dream this crap up Joey? You must stay up all night long trying to brain-storm this B.S. You're a fraud and everyone here knows it. Keep trying though. Every time you make an appearance you just drive your income down further.
And here's a free pointer for you Joeeey. The BBB doesn't report on success rates with the DA from bogus debt collectors. Sharpen up loser. Your as dull as a butter knife.

Here is a post by an attorney in my state of TX that clearly states if charges were not filed within two years of the date of the check,they can never be filed.Don't listen to Newhall's empty threats and don't give them any info their address listed on the BBB site is nothing but a mail drop.Call the place,I did and they will confirm it is not an office,just a mail drop.These people are abusive scammers and will get ugly when they don't get their will with you.

http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/texas-law-- ... on--493103.html

Wilshire Mail Box
www.wilshiremailbox.com/
Copyright © Wilshire Mail Box, HOME | ABOUT US | FAQ | PAYMENT | CONTACT US | PRIVACY POLICY
Google+ page
    5042 Wilshire Boulevard  Los Angeles, CA 90036
(323) 937-8340

The A+ Rating Says it All:

http://www.la.bbb.org/business-reviews/Collec ... es-CA-100118372

Keep it up internet deadbeats.

bbb....thats the part we dont understand,yes you do have a A+ rating so why do you act like a LOW LIFE LYING SLEAZY DIRT BAG COMPANY...[removed:lang] ..maybe once the BBB reads all the complaints about your company then the rating will change to a F, the lowest rating you can get

All the A+ rating says is what the company tells them. If the company says it resolved an issue the BBB takes them at their word and doesn't follow up with the complaining party (Been there Done that) Filing a complaint with the BBB doesn't mean crap if they don't follow up on it. TELL ME I'M WRONG [removed:lang], I have proof of what I'm writing

And what Joeeey doesn't tell you is that they are NOT accredited and the file on them at the BBB is just over 1 month old (9/7/12). We'll just give it another few days Joeeey. The 3 complaints currently showing will blossom I'm sure. Especially if your low-life ass keeps shilling on here. Give it up scum-bag. You're nothing but a fraudulent debt collector.

WOW is all i can say.. looks like the low life PDL scam collectors are now trying to "collect" fake bounced checks. One thing I see is that they state they are collecting from the individuals bank and not the retailer who the supposedly bounced the check on. The retailer is the one who would go after you NOT your bank.

Wake up people and be smart.. looks at all of the PDL scams on this website and read and you will see these are the same type scumbags trying this!!!!

As I review this string I see the following:

The website is good.. I notice NO PHONE#. I also notice the examples they give on fraud are exactly that FRAUD... People committing crimes of passing bad checks.. or on the one above from Pittsburg County it states she passed BOGUS check.. big difference then writing a check and it goes NSF and you totally forget about. I wrote a check 15 years ago and did have to go to court.. All I had to do was to pay the check and the fees associated with that. Not threatened with jail or anything.

I notice NO phone # listed for Newhall on the website. This goes back to other listing I have posted on 1-800 that scam artist (collection and telemarketers) are using company name that are legit so they can not be located. They use TOLL Free # or VIOP #'s that can not be traced.

You had to go to court because you wrote a worthless check? Gee, wonder if you HADN'T paid immediately if you would have spent some time in jail? Hmmmmm. Guess what "bogus check" is just another term for "worthless check" they both mean the same thing. And they do include checks you write that come back NSF - if you do not pay UPON DEMAND you are guilty of a crime.

Remember that little part of the check that said "pay to the order of." Hmmm wonder what that meant????

The den of thieves on this board is sickening.

The only thing is I did not have a collector call me and threaten me. It was a simple issue and no threats.The SCAM are threatening with a process server in 24 hours etc.. I was notified via mail., slipped my mind and got served by the sherrif (the correct way). It was not that I was trying to defraud the company, it was a simple mistake and then slipped my mind. The crinme I committed was stupidity. I was not charge with anything and just had to pay the check and the fees back. A big difference then the scam artist trying to collect bad checks or PDL loans and stating a warrent was out for your arrest ( I was not arrested - simply served with a court appearence).

Bogus check is a fake check which is worthless. One that is neither stolen or has fruadulent information
A NSf check is not a bogus check it is one that the funds were not in an account when presented to the bank. This can be caused by numerous reasons and not all are criminal. If one writes checks knowlingly that the funds are not going to be in the account and continues to write them then that is fraud.

Make sure you get your legal terms correct.