FTC Shuts Down Robocall Scammers Pretending To Be FTC

Last week, the Federal Trade Commission got a U.S. District Court in New York to shut down a robocall operation that allegedly scammed consumers by pretending to be the Federal Trade Commission.

In a complaint filed in federal court, the FTC charged that the operation run by The Cuban Exchange, Inc., also doing business as CrediSure America and MyiPad.us, and its principal, Suhaylee Rivera, deceptively claimed they could help consumers obtain refunds from the agency, in an effort to trick them into providing their personal information and bank account numbers.

According to the FTC, the company falsely told consumers it has helped “more than 13,000” people get refunds.  It also “spoofed” the FTC’s Consumer Response toll-free phone number, so that the FTC’s number appeared on consumers’ Caller ID devices.  The defendants also used a website address – ftcrefund.com – designed to confuse consumers into thinking the operation had a connection with the FTC.  The website has since been shut down.

“When the Federal Trade Commission returns money to consumers who have been ripped off, it doesn’t use robocalls, and it certainly doesn’t ask them to provide personal financial information,” said David Vladeck, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection.  “To anyone breaking the law by making illegal robocalls, transmitting phony Caller ID information, or impersonating a federal agency, we have two words for you: Stop now.  The real Federal Trade Commission will come after you.”

On the ftcrefund.com website, the FTC says consumers were told:

    “CrediSure has the proper knowledge and open door [sic] to expedite refunds you may not even know were owed to you. CrediSure works as a tireless collector and fiercely fights for its clients [sic] refunds to be paid first.”

Consumers are then told they will get a refund from the FTC in “five to seven business days, as opposed to the standard 8 to 10 weeks,” and instructs them to enter their “Seizure ID” number and “depository information” to get the process started. Consumers are told that the defendants will take 5.55 percent of the refund as a fee for the service of speeding up the refund process. They also falsely claim that, “Over 13,000 clients have received refunds through CrediSure America.”

Consumers who enter their “Seizure ID” number on the website are directed to a page on the site that provides them with information including the supposed name of the FTC case, the amount to be refunded, the fee the defendants will charge, and the supposed total amount of the refund the consumer will receive.  To get the “refund,” consumers must provide their address, phone number, bank name (including the name listed on the account), account number, routing number, and a check number, supposedly so refunds can be deposited directly into their accounts. 

The case is the 100th brought by the FTC over the past nine years alleging violations related to the national Do Not Call (DNC) Registry, which was launched in 2003.  The FTC alleged that, in addition to making illegal telemarketing robocalls, the defendants also called consumers whose phone numbers are on the Registry.

 

[The Story]

Comments

  • +3
    Mike
    | 17 replies
    It's interesting that this case has been brought after a relatively short amount of time, and if the claim is true, only 13,000 victims claimed.  Meanwhile, Rachel and her crew are still in operation after quite a few years and many thousands of complaints.  I guess this shows just that the FTC had to become a target before they became interested.  Perhaps now they will take our complaints more seriously (but don't hold your breath).
  • 0
    StopCallingMe replies to Mike
    | 3 replies
    I agree 100% Mike. Rachel has been at it I know for at least 7 years, maybe even longer. The FTC "claims" to have caught some companies making the calls, but I don't bet on the calls stopping. The reason is beause the calls are still pouring in as we speak. There is a huge epidemic of mass calls with people preying on people and trying to scam them out of their information and hard earned money, but I guess 7 plus years of that is not relevant or even considered fraud. Man, I should set me up a boiler room operation and make mass spoofed calls and make a killin off peoples hard earned money, because after all, it is NOT fraud. Its perfectly acceptable. Heck maybe I will get away with it for another 7 years. lol
  • +1
    Payback replies to StopCallingMe
    Until the people who enables such behavior gets massive amount of calls on all their personal numbers old and new, these calls will continue. Nobody has found a way to get rid of this new disease. In the future when people create new techology, human beings who turn cowardly and bring up new scams for personal gains. The cavemen had more balls to be frank.
  • 0
    yogi
    | 10 replies
    Now they are actually posing as the FTC itself in an effort to defraud people, and the FTC's response is to get a judge to make them stop?    Is it just me or does it seem to others that the criminal element doesn't appear especially intimidated by the threat of the FTC "coming after them"?   Here's my question:   WHEN DO THESE CROOKS GO TO JAIL?   If the only consequence of committing blatant fraud while posing as a government agency is to have a judge ask you to stop, the deterrent effect is somewhat limited--you know, like the defendants falling down laughing.    Is it any wonder Rachel is still in business and going strong after all these years and  all of the FTC's "successful" actions against the perpetrators?   The way things are going, Rachel will soon be posing as the  Rebate Department of the Supreme Court, at least until the FTC asks her nicely to stop.   And where the hell is the Justice Department in all this?   Can somebody wake them up?    It's been said before, but it's still sadly true: To crooked telemarketers, the FTC is just a speed bump on the way to the bank.
  • 0
    Payback replies to yogi
    | 5 replies
    Now you know why crooks laugh in the background. They are making a mockery of everything, and they think they can get away with fraud. Their laughter will stop when their own cops raid their boiler rooms one day. I am waiting for that day.
  • 0
    yogi replies to Payback
    | 4 replies
    "Hi, my name is Rachel.   There is no problem with your credit card at the present time, but I'm a Supreme Court justice an want to acquaint you with an amazing new program being offered by the US Supreme Court to lower your credit card bills through government rebates directly to your checking or savings account.  All I and the other justices need to start helping you today are the account numbers for your savings and checking accounts--any PIN numbers wouldn't hurt either.  It's just that simple!   This offer is only for a limited time, just like the last time I called, so please press "one" now to speak with a live associate justice, or "three" to "opt in" forever, and ever.   Have a nice day!"
  • 0
    StopCallingMe replies to yogi
    That is so funny, but it is so true.
  • 0
    StopCallingMe
    | 1 reply
    They may have shut down some that were calling pretending to be the FTC, but what is going to stop the next bunch of theives from doing the same thing? That is where the problem lies. Nothing is being done to PREVENT these types of calls.
  • 0
    Payback replies to StopCallingMe
    The formula is out there. Part of the formula is the VOIP which is utilized to spread this crap, and any fool that has an access to VOIP can set it up and start scamming. The source could be anywhere on Earth, and we'll have to deal with it from our end using updated technology.
  • 0
    JD replies to Mike
    | 9 replies
    The only reason this got any attention and was resolved is because it was a US communist/government agency that was being targeted.  And we know the FTC doesn't care about any of the millions of telemarketing companies out there who are screwing people over and stealing their money.  They only care about Obama's money.  And you can bet on it, not one person who was ripped off in this case will ever see a penny of their money back.

    Plain and simple folks- if you did not initiate the call and you don't know the number calling or the person you're talking to.  HANG UP THE FREAKIN PHONE!
  • 0
    StopCallingMe replies to JD
    | 2 replies
    Like I have said in many posts: If I don't recognize the number, I don't answer. I don't bother picking up the phone wasting my time.
  • 0
    Joe
    Another important point is that only 100 cases have been issued in 9 years. That is less than 1 case per month. Imagine the hundreds of government employees that have been living off this silly FTC approach to the problem. I get many calls PER DAY. They manage to press one case PER MONTH. It must be nice to have a job in which you do absolutely nothing except issue press releases complimenting yourself for doing a bad job.
  • 0
    an0n
    | 2 replies
    Have any of you heard of the notorious hacking collective "Anonymous"? Perhaps if we approach this group, we can enlist them to start an operation to route out these scam artists. Maybe if these scammers are scammed by a more professional group, they will succumb.
  • 0
    anonymous hacker replies to yogi
    | 2 replies
    Someone find me Rachel's personal information and I can make sure she is "permanently stopped".
  • 0
    Payback replies to an0n
    Good point. Scammers should get scammed.

Post a comment