Caller ID shows "V"+ a whole bunch of digits

  • 0
    MikeHuntleton replies to well
    | 2 replies
    Quote:
    The landing page for any phone number is the first post. There are no instructions there saying to go to the last page for the latest info.
    What are you babbling about?  The post by "LMFAO" is not the first post and anyone with a brain that happened to land on the first page of this thread can clearly see it shows there are 84 pages.

    "Nance" didn't even say anything as a response to what "LMFAO" posted, just blindly clicked the reply button and made a random comment.

    The Instructions is more than enough to show how to use the thread:
    Quote:
    Read comments below about ---number---. Report unwanted calls to help identify who is using this phone number.
    The words "Report unwanted calls" are a link to make a reply to the thread, if anyone bothered to check it. If you want to know about the number or topic, then you read the thread to the last post or simply use common sense and skip to the last post.
  • 0
    well replies to MikeHuntleton
    You should really work on your reading comprehension.
  • +1
    MikeHuntleton
    This should be good, you thinking I can't comprehend what was said, maybe you can explain it to me. I am all "ears", so go ahead and give it a try.
  • 0
    Just wondering replies to well
    | 1 reply
    Shouldn't the fact that the posting date is on every post tell them that the post is old and then by reading the other posts they can see that as they get farther back the dates get closer and closer to the present?
  • +1
    GregAtTheBeach replies to Just wondering
    You would *think* so, but I think George Carlin summed it up well:

    "Think about how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of 'em are stupider than that."
  • 0
    Tygerkat replies to MikeHuntleton
    Common sense ain't.
  • post pending moderator approval
  • post pending moderator approval
  • +1
    37 is between 100 and 300 replies to JP-5
    Quote:
    If you look closely at the numeric portion of the caller ID, you will decypher it as a time stamp.
    O wow. I hadn’t really looked too closely at the V number but yes, that’s how my last one went.

    https://800notes.com/Phone.aspx/1-931-264-1544#p2029734793955914422

    V6280921530008806370
    The call log in my phone states June 29 at 922 in the morning. I assume the 9215 is the exact time they tried and 922 is when it connected.

    I assumed the V meant “voip”.

    It is however a bit sad that this still happens even after a decade. Although for my caller ID it also shows what number they were trying to use for the spoof. Unsure if other cell providers include that  or not.
  • +2
    BackTracer
    "V" calls have disappeared on my phone over the last few months. Being that virtually every "V" call is spam, it seems the local carrier (Spectrum) is labeling them as "Spam Risk", which my blocker takes care of.

Reply to topic