Level 3 Communications

BigA, it has been my experience that people who rely on analogies in general, regardless of whether the analogies are valid, do so because they don't have any evidence to support their argument. Like what percentage of the calls coming from Level 3 Communications are illegal? Or what percentage of all illegal calls made come from Level 3? Is the volume of illegal calls from Level 3 to all recipients (not just the person posting) greater or less than the volume from other providers (in proportion to their legal calls)? As they say in the science business, "the plural of anecdote is not data".

Just going into my own personal experience Sir, not writing a scientific thesis.  I am one person not a control group and you can't get a statistical survey on one person alone so I'm not arguing against you...

As BigA pointed out, they busted some criminals. What BigA neglected to point out is that those crooks were committing cybercrime. (Gee, I wonder why would a company that sells internet security be interested in catching cyber criminals? ) Level 3 does not seem as enthusiastic about catching the scores of telemarketing crimes going through Level 3's systems... Of course this is purely subjective observation and speculation.

Note: I saved my big words for you, and not BigA.

"So your idea is that because someone sells something, they are responsible of its use?  So if Chevy sells a car and that person goes out gets drunk and gets into an accident that kills someone, Chevy is responsible?  If a pharmacist fills a prescription and that person sells those pills on the street, and someone dies, is the pharmacist responsible? "~BigA

"BigA, it has been my experience that people who rely on analogies in general, regardless of whether the analogies are valid, do so because they don't have any evidence to support their argument."~Sir Bedevere

Laddie, ye aren't making it any easier on ye own self by continuing the argument.

"So your idea is that because someone sells something, they are responsible of its use?  So if Chevy sells a car and that person goes out gets drunk and gets into an accident that kills someone, Chevy is responsible?  If a pharmacist fills a prescription and that person sells those pills on the street, and someone dies, is the pharmacist responsible? "~BigA

"BigA, it has been my experience that people who rely on analogies in general, regardless of whether the analogies are valid, do so because they don't have any evidence to support their argument."~Sir Bedevere

You had big words in there?  Guess you really must have a limited vocabulary.  But keep posting.  I have already noted a couple of mistakes you made.

hey Big A here is an idea to ponder about how about setting up a fake sales line say like, Wooden aircraft wing spars for Spad 13 1917-1918 model and and ask an outrageous price for just one. It took four two front and two rear, wire braced, left and right, I myself believe in ignoring the pest.

Oh I forgot to mention the lower wing takes four smaller spars also, basic same arrangement. So make that a total of eight, and oh yea, asked to be paid by western union or green dot, whatever.

So ye are just copying and pasting now? The post ye sent had no bearing on what I said-but ye knew that already...unless ye be that much of a fool

Hey Loch, offer to sell him some wing spars, who knows he/she/it might bite. If so reel them out of the water!

Nay laddie-don't trust him to pay...

Hmmm, maybe you are onto something big.  Wiretaps of Level 3 Communications revealed that:

Level 3 Communications had knowingly  communicated with and about rumors that Level 3 Communications had communications indicating  foreknowledge of privileged communications which definitively and decisively  communicated that  General Motors, using Chevrolet badging, remanufactured Spad 13 spars in several variants, and subsequently sold same spars  via Western Union Green Dot cards only to drunken pharmacists who had been selling synthetic marijuana (But the GOOD s**t), to local Community College Communication Majors who had been studying communications at lower levels to get the Communications Degrees needed to work for Level 3 Communications.

I am hoping that you will now be as sick of listening to yourself parse logic as most of us are of listening to you scrabble like a rat in a storm drain as it swirls down the sink toward entropy.  I even forget, thankfully, what side you are fighting on; For or Against L3C.   I am not sure you even remember.

You are too in love with your own positions of the moment.  A wise debater first prepares and then presents his views, his thesis, his theory.  He listens and concedes points out of fairness; seeking truth.  The minds of the listeners or readers are enlarged by degrees, understanding is enhanced.
Debate alone, Dear Child.  I urge others to leave you to your swirling.

You are dull and uninteresting and have not done a lick of your homework on the topic at hand.  You are reactionary in the way of the unprepared.  Just drop it.

Did you miss the part where agreed that Sir B. is right, I already dropped it... pay attention.

Until now, I had more respect for you...I thought you was done with the kneejerk reactionary posts and the bandwagon riding. I thought you could be your own individual. You have to troll along with your friends...well READ the last two pages before you say stupid stuff. Shame on you because you're better than that, I know it.

I don't like Level 3, and I don't like them because I don't like them. I know they're not the ones doing the calling, but doesn't mean I have to like them or the industry they cater to. I never said I thought Level 3 were the scammers, I think they make money off scammers and don't care about the rest of us. That makes me dislike them and that's all the reason I need. It's MY oppinion. I'm not gonna sit here and gripe about telemarketers and at the same time defend a company that caters to them. Why is that so hard to understand? It is hard for me to understand why you would take time outta your day to troll someone who for one reason or another just don't like Level 3. Why should you care? why should ANYONE care if I come on here and vent about a slimeball company?

They (L3C) can help bust cyber criminals, but do absolutely nothing about phone scammers. That's Bollocks! Now Let that sink in and forget about what your friends might say for one moment and really really THINK.
If Level 3 can bust cyber criminals, surely they could do something about the telemarketing crooks...kinda validates my oppinion they are slime bags.

Act like you can think for yourself without bias.

Go ahead and insult me again, I'm already disappointed in you so a little more won't hurt much.

Relax kid, Kinda hard to take being shot out of the sky, when your flying so high. Remember your dealing with a bunch of skeptics here. And yepper I've been shot down a few times myself, hang in there.

Here is a little song for you https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjKh3kggKaA