FTC Hangs Up On “Rachel From Cardholder Services”

For several years, American consumers have been receiving illigal and unwanted robocalls with a recorded message from “Rachel”, "Heather", most recently "Ann" or vaguely named “Cardholder Services.”

Finally today, the Federal Trade Commission announced it had pulled the plug on five companies behind these scammy robocalls: federal courts granted the agency’s request to temporarily halt five robocall operations that allegedly deceived consumers into paying hundreds or thousands of dollars by making phony claims that they could reduce credit card interest rates in return for an upfront fee.

The robocalls purport to have an “important message” regarding an opportunity to reduce high credit card interest rates, and consumers are urged to “press 1” to connect with a live representative, or “press 2” to discontinue getting such calls.  Consumers who press 1 are connected to live telemarketers, who then pitch deceptive offers to have the credit card interest rates substantially reduced, sometimes to as low as 6.9 or even zero percent.

In some cases, according to the FTC, the telemarketers claim to be calling from the consumer’s credit card company.  In other cases, they use “Cardholder Services” to suggest a relationship with a bank or credit card company.  If the consumer expresses an interest in the rate reduction offer, the telemarketer sometimes conducts a purported “audit” to determine whether the consumer qualifies. 

Consumers provide their financial and personal information, and are then put on hold while the “audit” is completed.  According to the FTC, the “audit” typically is used only to determine whether consumers have enough credit available on their credit cards to pay the company’s fee.

After consumers have been “approved” for the program the telemarketer informs them that there is an up-front fee, typically ranging from several hundred dollars to nearly $3,000.  To convince them to pay the fee, telemarketers often say that it will be more than offset by the money the consumer will save through the program.  In some cases, the FTC alleges that consumers’ credit cards were charged even if they did not agree to pay for the service.  In other cases, the defendants allegedly do not disclose a fee at all, or claim there will be no fee.

After consumers pay the up-front fee they typically find that the companies do little or nothing to lower their credit card interest rates.  The only thing that some companies do, according to the FTC, is to initiate three-way calls with consumers’ credit card issuers and orally request a rate reduction, a request that consumers could make on their own and that invariably is denied.

The five complaints announced today were filed against the following companies and their principals:

1) Treasure Your Success

2) Ambrosia Web Design

3) A+ Financial Center

4) The Green Savers, and

5) Key One Solutions

(click on the links above to read the phone call reports made by the community about the defendants.)

The Story

Comments

  • +7
    Hallelujah!
    | 107 replies
    And the world just got a teeny weeny bit brighter. Hope the perpetrators lose every penny they made through this bottom-feeder and in the interest of justice I would suggest that a telephone be placed just out of reach of their prison cells and set to ring 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for the duration of their sentences.
  • +1
    john
    | 8 replies
    I hate to sound cynical, but it sounds like yet another series of civil cases where significant fines are imposed, only to be drastically reduced once the defendants claim "poverty," meaning all the money was stashed offshore in secret accounts and the government can't find it.   (These crooks aren't  stupid.)   Unless criminal sanctions are imposed, all it will prove is telemarketers can get away with it, over and over again.    Unless these characters get locked up "Rachel" will be calling again in the near future.
  • 0
    Lloyd
    Ironically, I was led to this site and article because I just got this call not 10 minutes ago.  Perhaps their cut-off date hasn't arrived yet..?
  • 0
    Shill Alert
    Once again, the crooks pay a nominal toll on the cost-of-doing-business highway, and it's one of those tollbooths where you can throw the coins in without even hardly stopping. Hey, at least the fines cover the cost of the Press Release!
  • 0
    Payback replies to john
    This should be a deterrent to the crooks who lease numbers to scammers. Crooks who set up boiler rooms overseas and control them from here. Criminal punishment is much better than fines. Robbers who robs a home or a store goes to jail, so must the crooks who set these scammers up to funnel money into their crooked accounts.
  • +2
    Payback replies to john
    The best deterrent would be something similar to the punishment in Singapore for the possession and sale of illegal drugs.
  • 0
    Thomas
    Funny.  They will be back in business in a day or so.  Like Lloyd, I received a call from them, but it was yesterday.

    The crooks pay a fine or go out of business and start a new business with the same people and same equipment and are back in operation in days.

    They need criminal penalties, not civil penalties.
  • 0
    DaFox
    Well even if the "gals" do crawl back out from under their rocks later,
    WTG FTC !!
    :)
  • 0
    Mississippi Gulf Coast
    Well... we'll see if targeting 5 companies is enough.  I've  received at least a dozen calls from "Rachel" from at least as many different numbers (reported every one of them)  Sometimes, caller ID displays 'Card Serv Inc', sometimes it's 'Cardservices', and other times it's 'Name Unknown' or 'Name Not Found' or 'Unknown Caller' ...sometimes there appear to be a legitimate phone number, other times it's 3 digits then 000-0000 ... and a few times the entire number is 0's.  Sometimes I answer, other times the message actually gets partially recorded on my answering machine.  The most recent call ... TODAY (11/1/2012) at 4:55pm.  (Oh, the number displayed this time was 408-412-4097)
  • 0
    sdflatlander2
    | 7 replies
    The words in the article that I find the most disappointing are "temporarily halt".  They will be back.  If you really like peeing into the wind go ahead and report, and report and then report again.  It is similar to chasing your tail.  I do have the time on some of these idiotic calls to suck up their time.  One day a woman sat and listened to 2 hours of classic rock that I played for her as I "looked" for my cards.  2 hours!!!  Last tune - I'm a Loser, the Beatles.  With global warming the Antartic continent should be ice free soon and it could be turned into a penal continent ala Australia, sell them to the Somalia pirates for slaves, give them each a gallon of water and air lift them to the center of the Sahara, take them to the Castaway island, etc, etc.  But of course we do not want to do anything cruel and unusual.  So I do like the idea of trapping them with a relentless ringing phone.  No matter what the feds do there is always going to be some other leech step right into their shoes.  Endure friends, endure.
  • 0
    granny
    I just got a call from them and it is the second time this week.  I am SO sick of this!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • 0
    AnneT
    Hah...I just got another call from Rachel too...
  • 0
    Payback replies to sdflatlander2
    | 5 replies
    I don't understand the temporary halt part either. Temporary halting them so that they can get back to their scam in the future? FTC is confusing people here.
  • 0
    Payback
    | 2 replies
    I believe these credit card scammers are controlled by multiple fraud companies not just one guy.
  • 0
    TMP
    Funny, I just got a call on my cell phone yet again from Cardholder Services, this time from phone number 718-416-6103.

Post a comment